Blue Light Therapy: The Safe Alternative

Blue Light Therapy: The Safe Alternative

Acne is a well known skin problem that most of the people rendering this article have faced in their lives at some point in time and in some form or other with testimonial to intensity. Well known treatments include many western and eastern medicines as well as a host of alternative treatments in Homeopathy and individual tradition care methods which may or may not be successful from person to person.
One of the most recent alternatives for acne treatment is blue photodynamic therapy or blue light therapy. Scientists have discovered that light of a certain perspicacity ( within the 400 - 480 nm range ). The naturally occurring Porphyrins in the human body is a substance released by the breakdown of blood cells and Acne Bacteria ( ' Propionobacterium acnes ' - or - ' P. acnes ' ); releases this substance as well. When it is exposed to this light in the blue spectrum, there is damage produced which destroys this bacteria.
Safety mode for Blue Light treatment
The FDA ( U. S. Food and Drug Administration ) classifies laser and light therapies as procedure - oriented treatment and considers it as a legal and safe procedure which is effective in treating acne. FDA considerate narrow - band, immense - intensity blue - light therapy for this proposal. The most important thing to note is that this treatment is painless and can easily be carried out by oneself at home.
Known Side - effects
Blue light therapy does not cause any known permanent damage. It has been empirical that the side effects that are experienced are passing, related as brief changes in the pigmentation of the skin with some swelling and dryness in the treated area. Since there is no genuineness of UV rays in blue light apparatuses, there is little danger to skin cells. Low intensity blue light is also much suggested for daily use and causes little or no dryness, irritation or other side effects.
Blue light response on eyesight
There has been much speculation of the waves of blue light therapy on the eyesight. Some scientists believe that blue light is a possible cause for the enhanced development of Age - related Macular Degeneration ( AMD ) which is nowadays related to the retinal stress that results from exposure of the eye to visible blue light; especially amongst older test subjects ( the phrase used is blue light hazard ). This degeneration is common amongst all adults over the age of 40 as it is a natural process. To catch this factor better, mull over the reality that blue light belongs to the visible spectrum, that is, the spectrum of light is beyond the UV range of light ( light in the UV range or extraordinarily violet light, is non - exterior and is the senior cause for damage to the retina ). The over damage is pointed to eventuate with strong flourish to ( the manage marking of ) phosphorescent blue light. This is true for all light treatments as the remark from shimmering light can potentially damage the eyes anyway. Blue light treatment is usually limited to two sessions a year for 15 fifteen diary each, thereby reducing any possible risk to the eyes. The human eye is flinty to be informed this ( blue ) awareness of light and therefore it is not harmful, especially if controlled exposure is used for treatment along with convenient eye cover related as a patch or dark glasses.
It is important for patients especially those with eye conditions, retinal damage, have undergone recent eye surgery ( e. g. cataract removal ), or have other conditions that move sight cognate forms of diabetes to should repeatedly consult an ophthalmologist before and during any form of light therapy.
Blue light therapy for skin
Blue light therapy for skin treatment, especially for acne treatment, is considered safe. Blue - light devices do not contain UV light, which damages skin cells, as is a known actuality. Visible blue light has been suggested to cause DNA excuse although there is no evidence for this; with limited exposure treatment, enzymes within skin cells are implicit to repair these freedom. There is further no evidence of cancer development as a decision of damaged cells.